Compare and contrast parliamentary and congressional democracies Essay

Compare and contrast parliamentary and congressional democracies - Essay ExampleThis paper aims to adjudicate this question, as well as consider which of the deuce is best and why. To evaluate the congressional and parliamentary systems, we must first understand the basic policy-making structure. The legislature, in modern political systems, is representative of the population (Cheibub, 2011). It is calm of members elected indirectly or directly via a popular vote and are empowered to change, rush or repeal the nations laws and also to regulate and levy its taxes. Legislatures that provide for direct copy are considered, as being extra democratic since they are less liable to domination by one faction. The executive is devoted to the administration and en soldieryment of laws created by the legislature. The key to variance found between the two systems is the relationship shared by the legislature and the executive and their degree of linkage (Cheibub, 2011). Under a parliament ary democracy, the executive is subordinate to the legislatures majority (Cheibub, 2011). The executive is required to keep the legislatures majority in check to remain in power. This is the key to stability since it promotes the creation and development of check and cohesive parties, as well as emphasizing on compromise and cooperation. To keep the majority, the government, may arrive at to form coalitions with other parliamentary parties to build a majority base on mutual remove and compromise. Parliamentary system structure also allows for easy power transition since the leadership is ground on parties rather than exclusives. As opposed to a parliamentary structure, a presidential form of democracy separates the legislature and the executive (Cheibub, 2011). The president gains power, not through a majority in the legislature, but through a direct election. The population in this system will vote for an individual rather than a party. The success then becomes president for a fixed term. In a majority of the cases, a major political party backs the President, and gains popularity based on party stature and personal qualities (Cheibub, 2011). The discrepancy between the two begins with the kickoff of the two words (Cheibub, 2011). Congress comes from the Latin word that means coming together, where representatives from all over the coarse come together to discuss state matters. Parliament, however, is rooted, in a French term meaning, to talk since a lot of talking goes on, in parliament. A congress is based on primary elections where the population elects their candidates based on individual office plans and personalities while, in parliament, the delegates are elected to run by their parties based on their willingness to adhere by party standards. In congress, the party really means more in elections than the individual does. In a parliamentary democracy, the PM and his cabinet are elected from the countrys majority party in parliament. Therefore, i f the members begin to vote against the ideals of their party, then the government may come apart and force new elections. Because of this, most parties restrict the freedoms of their delegates to ensure the PM safety. In congress, however, the branch of the executive is separated entirely from the legislature and it allows members to vote based on the wishes of their constituents and their consciences, without fearing harming the government permanently. This increased power of the individual leads to